ValueOps Blog

Operational Blindness Is the New Technical Debt

Written by Marla Schimke | Feb 12, 2026 9:44:51 PM

For decades, we have defined technical debt strictly in terms of concepts like aging code, legacy infrastructure, and shortcuts taken during rapid development. But as the digital enterprise accelerates, a more insidious form of debt has emerged. This debt directly threatens the stability and resilience of your organization.

It is called operational blindness.

Operational blindness is the inability to see how technical work translates into business value. It accumulates in the silent gaps between disparate tools, disconnected teams, and siloed data. For leaders, the cost is not just diminished efficiency. It is the inability to lead with confidence.

The trust gap in data

We have entered an era in which speed is a critical mandate. Fueled by Agile, DevOps, and now generative AI, our organizations have optimized for throughput. We are deploying faster than ever. Yet high-velocity software delivery is wasteful if it is decoupled from business outcomes. (See a prior post that details how AI can expose strategic flaws in product management.)

A December 2023 Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) study found that respondents in 44% of organizations only somewhat trust the data given to end users for decision-making.

If you are responsible for the total cost of ownership (TCO) of enterprise systems, you know the pain of this trust gap. When financial planning sits on one island and engineering execution on another, the enterprise operates in a fractured fashion. You cannot determine which investments pay off. You cannot effectively guide innovation because AI cannot compensate for missing or unreliable data.

Integration as a strategic imperative

How can leaders bridge the trust gap and harness the data required for better decision-making?

Forward-looking IT leaders are shifting their focus. They are moving from managing disparate projects to orchestrating value streams. This requires viewing data integration not as a janitorial task but as a strategic imperative.

Consider Tokio Marine North America Services (TMNAS). Robert Clee, the IT Associate VP, faced a common challenge: Siloed data was causing development and QA teams to drift out of sync. Status updates languished in unread emails while offshore resources waited.

Clee did not look for a huge overhaul. He looked for connection. By implementing a solution to integrate data across disparate systems, the team quickly unlocked productivity. "We want to be productive immediately," Clee noted. "The faster we can do that, the more value we bring to our organization."

Predictability creates trust

For infrastructure leaders, the ultimate metric is rarely just speed. It is predictability. Predictability creates the stability necessary for five nines reliability.

Dimitrios Psarros, a technical fellow at Honeywell International, utilized Value Stream Management (VSM) to gain deep visibility into the flow of work. The goal was to limit context switching for developers and identify bottlenecks.

The result was a shift to governance based on data, not guesswork. His team achieved a state in which 90% of work was completed in less than five days. As Psarros noted, "If your work is predictable, there’s trust." That is the currency operations leaders trade in.

The way forward

Why is data integration a strategic imperative for modern IT leadership? Data quality is no longer a back-office concern. Realizing value requires information that flows in real time across the entire ecosystem.

We must demand tools that provide visibility beyond simple server health. We need to see value delivery. We must build a culture that values data transparency as much as code quality. If we want to empower our teams to make good decisions, we must provide them with the infrastructure to access trusted data.

Don't let data gaps compound your technical debt. Operational blindness is a debt we can no longer afford to carry. It is time to turn the lights on.

Read the full analysis on how industry leaders are closing the trust gap in the Harvard Business Review Analytic Services briefing paper, “Connecting Data That Powers Real-Time, Value-Generating Insights.”

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between traditional technical debt and operational blindness?

While traditional technical debt involves aging code and legacy infrastructure, operational blindness is the inability to see how technical tasks create business value. This visibility gap accumulates when tools and data are siloed, leaving leaders unable to lead with confidence.

How did Honeywell use VSM to improve operations?

Honeywell utilized VSM to gain deep visibility into workflows, which helped leaders identify bottlenecks and limit context switching for developers. This data-driven governance enabled the team to complete 90% of their work in under five days.

Why is there currently a "trust gap" in organizational data?

The trust gap exists because organizations struggle to maintain accuracy across increasingly fragmented and complex data sources, forcing leaders to doubt the metrics they see. This skepticism is compounded by the "black box" nature of modern AI, which generates insights without the transparency or context required for humans to validate them.

What is the first step toward overcoming operational blindness?

Organizations must shift from managing disparate projects to orchestrating value streams through strategic data integration. This involves building a culture that prioritizes data transparency and real-time information flow across the entire ecosystem.