For a long time, the best infrastructure was invisible. If servers were running and uptime metrics were solid, nobody said a word. Infrastructure was the static in the background, the essential hum that kept the business alive. In this traditional dynamic, infrastructure leaders were often viewed as maintenance workers rather than architects. When a company planned a renovation, they invited the designers to the table, but they rarely invited the people responsible for the pipes. You were simply expected to keep the water flowing.
That era is over. We are shifting into a phase of digital business where computing power is no longer just a utility. It is a competitive differentiator. This shift is driven primarily by the increased adoption of artificial intelligence (AI).
With increasing speed, organizations are moving toward a reality in which AI agents and processing engines generate significant business value. In this paradigm, the companies that succeed will be the ones that can gain the most useful computing yield for every dollar spent.
This is a capital battle. It is an arms race. In this environment, viewing your infrastructure merely as a cost center to be minimized is a strategic error. You need a new approach, one that brings granular visibility to what has historically been a financial black box. In short, you need to employ infrastructure portfolio management (IPM).
To make optimal decisions, you must look at the reality of the modern landscape. Infrastructure generally comes in three varieties:
Historically, teams treated these distinct environments as a monolithic budgetary line item. You set a budget for the year, and the next year you were told to increase or decrease it by five or ten percent. There was rarely a zero-based budgeting justification for why that infrastructure existed or what specific value it delivered. It was just there. It often predated the current executives, and nobody wanted to rock the boat unless a server reached end-of-life status or a contract expired.
This lack of visibility creates a massive problem when you try to modernize. Leaders struggle to answer basic questions. Should we run this new AI initiative on a hyperscaler? Should we build it privately? If we repatriate workloads from the public cloud to a private cloud, will we actually save money?
Without granular data, you cannot answer these questions. You are operating based on estimates and assumptions rather than hard unit economics.
Across industries, teams in many organizations have tried to solve this visibility gap with traditional PPM tools. However, there is a fundamental disconnect in their architecture. Most legacy PPM systems try to force infrastructure into a project construct.
But a data center is not a project. A server farm is not a project. These are persistent assets and services. When you try to force a persistent asset into a tool designed for initiatives with a fixed beginning and end, you end up with inadequate data and frustrated teams. You might see vendors trying to disguise products as projects just to make these assets fit their rigid architecture. This does not work for an infrastructure leader who needs to manage lifecycles, depreciation, and ongoing operational resilience.
This is where ValueOps by Broadcom takes a different path—enabling intelligent IPM. The philosophy here is investment neutrality. Whether you call it a project, a product, an asset, or a service, it is an investment vehicle. ValueOps does not force you to adopt a language that does not fit your reality. Instead, the solution allows you to model your investments in the way that makes sense for your organization.
The second major failure of legacy tooling is the inability to handle shared costs accurately.
Imagine you have a robust private cloud environment. You might know the total cost of operation for that environment. But if the CFO asks how much it costs to operate a specific application, can you provide an accurate answer?
In a modern architecture, that single application might be sharing computing, storage, and networking resources with four other applications. Most financial tools fail to account for this level of allocation. These tools are capable of tying a specific asset to a specific cost center, but they struggle when that asset is sliced four ways. You end up dumping data into spreadsheets and manually manipulating numbers to figure out which business unit owes what. This process is slow, inaccurate, and impossible to scale.
Clarity by Broadcom, a core component of the ValueOps solution, solves this problem by providing the allocation tables necessary to distribute correlated costs to their respective business purposes. It can ingest the raw spending data from other financial repositories and apply the logic needed to break bills down.
This means you can finally see the true total cost of ownership for a specific business initiative. You can see that a critical application requires not just labor, but a precise allocation of hardware and shared networking. This visibility allows for real accountability.
There is another nuance that technical teams often overlook but finance teams obsess over. That is the fiscal calendar.
Many operational tools can tell you what assets you have or what bills you paid. But they lack fiscal awareness. They do not know which fiscal period a cost belongs to or how that compares to the budget set for that specific window.
ValueOps is aligned with the concept of the fiscal calendar. It does not just show you a bill. It shows you how that spending maps to your financial planning cycles. This context turns raw data into actionable financial intelligence. It reveals whether you are over budget for a specific quarter or if a cloud expense hit during a period where margins were already tight. (See how this calendar-aware planning and budgeting was one of the key areas of strength cited in the GigaOm Radar report.)
Why does this matter? Why should a VP of infrastructure care about fiscal periods and cost allocation tables?
Because this visibility is the only way to validate modernization. We see many executives struggling to justify moves to modern private cloud platforms, for example. These leaders know intuitively it is the right move for resilience and governance, but they cannot prove the ROI. Why? Because they never measured the cost of their legacy data center effectively. They cannot show the risk mitigation savings because they never quantified the cost of the old, unsupported hardware.
With ValueOps, you can model these scenarios. You can show the cost of the status quo versus the cost of innovation. You can demonstrate that while the upfront investment in a modern platform might be significant, the risk mitigation and efficiency gains pay for themselves over time. (Find out more about how ValueOps helps you gauge the true ROI of AI.)
As we look forward, the composition of your spending is going to change. Automation and AI agents will likely reduce the headcount required for certain operational tasks. But that money will not disappear. It will shift.
You might need fewer humans for routine maintenance, but you will need more infrastructure capacity to run the agents that replaced them. The labor line item shrinks, and the infrastructure line item grows. If you are not prepared to explain that shift and show that the total cost of the business initiative went down even though the infrastructure cost went up, you will face massive headwinds during budget season.
In the computing arms race, visibility is ammunition. You cannot optimize what you cannot measure, and you cannot measure a dynamic, shared environment with static, project-based tools.
IPM is no longer about keeping the lights on. It is about understanding the precise cost of delivering value. It is about eliminating the black box. By leveraging ValueOps, you move beyond manual spreadsheet allocations and gain the clarity needed to lead. You stop being the plumber and become the architect of your organization's digital future.
To continue the discussion, please sign up for a demo and conversation.
Infrastructure is transitioning from being an invisible utility and a cost center to a critical competitive differentiator. This shift is driven by the acceleration of AI usage, which requires organizations to expand computing capacity, while optimizing cost efficiency.
Using legacy PPM tools, teams are forced to treat persistent assets and services, like data centers and server farms, in a "project" construct that is designed for initiatives that have finite start and end dates. This architectural disconnect results in poor data, making it difficult for leaders to manage the lifecycle, depreciation, and ongoing operational resilience of modern infrastructure.
Clarity provides allocation tables that can ingest raw spending data and allocate costs of shared resources, including computing, storage, and networking, to the specific applications or business initiatives that consume them. This enables teams to measure the true total cost of ownership.
Fiscal awareness means the solution understands the concept of the fiscal calendar. It maps infrastructure spending to the organization’s financial planning cycles, turning raw data into actionable financial intelligence. With this insight, leaders can immediately see if they are over budget for a specific quarter or if an expense hit during a period of tight margins.